A 2024 Tom Hanks Flop Is Finally Finding Its Audience On Netflix

MT HANNACH
7 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!






The writer, director and stars of “Forrest Gump” come together after 30 years for a new drama with high concept. You can imagine that this premise is easily sold to salivating studio leaders. And yet, “here” by Robert Zemeckis was a critical and commercial failure when he made his debut in November 2024. What happened? Well, according to criticism, the film is simply bad. More specifically it is, according to Time‘Kevin Maher, “like watching the Sims get dementia.” What does that mean? You will have to watch the film to discover, which you can now do easily on Netflix.

If, out of pure curiosity, you decide to broadcast Zemeckis failures, you will not be the only one. Netflixers currently gives unhappy drama a modest stay on the streamer, “here” making its most watched path. The success of the streaming of the film ends a month which saw the similar sports drama “You must believe” mounting the Netflix graphicscompensated by one of the best A24 horror offers, “Hereditary”, also dominating the most watched film paintings. The latter, at least, reminds us that Netflix is ​​not simply generic streaming slag … Although it is also the month that saw Cameron Diaz return to act with “Back in Action”, ” A truly abject comedy action that inexplicably triumphed over Netflix graphicsAlso.

Now the addition of the final touch to such a confused month is “here”, which currently has a chance to hit the number one on Netflix in the United States, it will probably not be much consolidation for Zemeckis and Co. But it will be at least something for a film that had to lose sorting images a lot of money.

Netflix subscribers are here for here

“Here” did not necessarily need to be as bad as the criticisms claim it. The film, which Robert Zemeckis co-written with the scribe “Forrest Gump” Eric Roth, is based on the 2014 graphic novel by Richard McGuire. The graphic novel and the 1989 six -page comic strip on which it developed were well received, and although a film that uses a locked shot may seem tedious, it is at least a new idea in the middle of a cinematographic landscape which often seems actile hostile to such things.

By focusing on a single plot of earth over millions of years, the cinematographic version of Zemeckis of “Here” focuses on the history of Tom Hanks and Richard and Margaret Young by Robin Wright. The couple moved to a house built at this particular location and we see their lives unfolding from the same point of view, everything while the images are covered with the screen representing the same place at different moments of the distant past. Unfortunately, due to the central story of life, the dreaded technology of inconvenience was unleashed on Hanks and Wright, that Zemeckis had to be more fatty for the critical factory.

Perhaps without surprise, then, that all have increased to a financial and creative disaster, with “here” by doing just $ 15.7 million Worldwide with a budget of $ 50 million. But the Netflixers fortunately broadcast the drama that flows the story insofar as they propelled the film into the graphics of the streamer. “Here” arrived on Netflix in the United States on January 30, 2025 and, according to the streaming viewers tracker FlixpatrolThe film immediately traced, hitting the number two in the United States on January 31. He stayed there the next day before going to number five on February 2, where he remains at the time of the editorial staff. Could it have been a total theatrical disaster, but could it “here” arrive at the number one by the end of the week?

Maybe here at number one on Netflix?

To say “here” was a critical disaster may not be entirely exact. The film currently has a 37% score on Rotten tomatoes And a slightly more encouraging average score of 4.4 out of 10. That is to say that not all criticisms hated “here”, although the Rotten Tomatoes classification system is not the most coherent thing. A “Positive” review by Peter Bradshaw in The guardianFor example, urges viewers to allow “the folk heat of the performance of Tom Hanks and Robin Wright” to be cut [the film] A little soft. “It’s a kind, I suppose.

Here in / film, our The review “here” maintains that the film is an interesting experience that has been wrongWith Chris Evangelista deplores what is equivalent to “a terribly sad film about broken dreams; a constant reminder that life is a long and sad business that ends with the tragedy”. Barely the kind of thing that fans of “Forrest Gump” probably expected to enter this ostensibly triumphant meeting.

All this does not increase really well for “here” and its chances of Netflix in the future. The beginnings of the number two in the United States the day after his arrival was a very good start, but many other films made their debut at the first “Lift” by Kevin Hart, who is surely even less worthy of a watch that “here”. Meanwhile, in order to make first place, the last of Robert Zemeckis will face the mega-Hit of Cameron Diaz “back in action” which is always in a way in number two on the Netflix charts as a function of Flixpatrol. The current streamer champion is at least a decent offer, with Ralph Fiennes serving a delightfully nasty party in “The Menu”. Can Zemeckis’ Soppy failure overcome such ratings? Maybe if there were millennia to do so. From now on, it doesn’t look great.



Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *