Unlock the publisher’s digest free
Roula Khalaf, editor -in -chief of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
On Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer resisted increasing pressure to ensure that British deputies a vote on a trade agreement with Donald Trump, as London officials insisted that the pact could be agreed in front of a sensitive EU summit.
Allies of Starmer said that he would like to conclude an agreement with Trump before the Prime Minister sits down with EU leaders On May 19, concerned that the London summit could thwart the American president.
Some senior British officials say it is possible that Great Britain can conclude a trio of commercial transactions with the United States, the EU and India in the next three weeks. “This is the dream scenario,” said one of them, but they admitted that the uncertainties had remained above the agreements with Washington and New Delhi.
Some deputies fear that Starmer may sign a lower or precipitated quality agreement with Trump before the EU summit and wants him to honor a commitmentSince work was in opposition in 2021, to let them debate and vote on commercial transactions.
But during the Prime Minister’s questions on Wednesday, Starmer said that the government “would act in the national interest”, but that if an agreement was concluded “, it would go through the procedures known for this house”.
Unlike legislation, commercial transactions are concluded by governments using “prerogative powers”. Parliament cannot change the treaties, including trade agreements, and debates and votes on the treaties remain largely at the discretion of ministers.
A information note By the library of the House of Commons, says that if deputies can indefinitely delay the ratification of a treaty, the process is heavy and the municipalities have never “used this power”.
Liam Byrne and Emily Thornberry, Labor chairs for trade committees and foreign affairs respectively, asked the deputies to vote, like Sir Ed Davey, Liberal Democrat.
Byrne said: “With regard to commercial transactions, ministers must be free to negotiate, but parliament must be free to judge. We debate in the dark without any knowledge of the mandate for us, no clarity on the red lines, and no disonce on compromises.”
The arrangement of three commercial transactions would represent a major economic coup to Starmer, although diplomacy to negotiate closer links with the EU – a block which said that Trump was put in place to “screw” America – alongside an agreement with Washington is difficult.
The last project of the press release from the EU Summit / United Kingdom, seen by the FT, will not play well in the White House. He says that the two parties share a “commitment to free and open trade”, have a “commitment to multilateralism” and will support Ukraine against “Russian aggression”.
The joint declaration confirms that Great Britain is much more closely aligned with Europe than the White House, speaking of working with “partners sharing the same ideas” to “mitigate the impact of fluctuations of the global economic order”.
Starmer allies say that “intensive” talks with the United States are taking place at the ministerial and official level, but admitting that the moment of any agreement remains uncertain. “Everything comes down to a single man,” said an ally, referring to Trump.
While other commercial transactions are more important to the economic level for the United States, an agreement with Great Britain would be relatively simple, since the two parties have a largely balanced commercial relationship, mainly based on services.
However, some deputies fear that Starmer will accept American requests to dilute the standards of food or well -being of Britain animals – refused by Downing Street – or water online protections.
Great Britain reported that it was willing to reduce its prices, including a 10% levy from cars manufactured in the United States, and to reduce its digital services tax in exchange for Trump, reducing its new 25% prices on cars and steel imports.
Some British officials hope that Trump could be ready to reduce his global rate by 10% “basic” in the case of the United Kingdom, although they admit that it is a much more ambitious objective in talks.
Starmer said Michael EllamHis global economy advisor, to manage all overlap of the two sensitive negotiations with Washington and Brussels. Ellam was in the oval office during the Starmer meeting with Trump in February.
One of Starmer’s main objectives in EU talks, alongside a new security pact, is a drop in obstacles in food trade with Europe, achievable by definitively aligning Britain with Brussels rules, which prohibit certain imports of American beef and chicken.
Sam Lowe, a commercial expert and principal researcher visiting King’s College London, said that the alignment of Brussels rules on food and agriculture to facilitate the negotiation of food would make “difficult or impossible to concede American demands to modify British food standards”.
