Trump revokes security clearance for Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and others

President Donald Trump revoked the security authorizations of his previously defeated democratic electoral rivals, Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton, as well as a number of other former civil servants and criticisms.

Trump said in February He revoked the security authorization for his predecessor Joe Biden. His order confirmed this decision, adding that he also revoked the security authorization of “any other member” of the Biden family.

“I determined that it is no longer in the national interest in the following people to access classified information,” said Trump’s memorandum.

Former American presidents and senior security officials generally retain their security authorization as courtesy.

Trump ordered the leaders of the department and the agency to “revoke access without escort to secure the American government’s installations for these people”.

“This action includes, but without limiting itself, the reception of classified briefings, such as the daily memory of the president, and access to classified information held by any member of the intelligence community under the previous mandate of the people appointed to the Congress,” said the order.

For several named figures, loss of access to materials and classified spaces will have a more symbolic impact.

It can limit the materials that they are able to examine or restrict access to certain government buildings or to secure the facilities.

However, lawyers and prosecutors appointed by Trump could potentially face road dams by accessing or examining information for their business or their customers.

Trump’s revocations focus on the senior officials of the Biden administration, as well as political criticism and lawyers who challenged Trump or his allies to the Court.

Biden Secretary of State Antony Blinken, national security advisor Jake Sullivan, and assistant general prosecutor Lisa Monaco have all lost their authorization.

Trump also targeted two of his own former civil servants in his first mandate: Fiona Hill and Alexander Vindman, who testified during his first indictment trial which began in 2019.

Trump also revoked access to high -level Republican criticism, the former representative Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.

They were the only two republican legislators to have joined an investigation by the American Chamber on the role of Trump in the attack of January 6, 2021 against the Congress.

Both also voted to charge Trump during his second dismissal, that a room of American representatives led by Democrats triggered after the riot. Trump was acquitted by the Senate to encourage the riot on January 6.

Trump also distinguished the best legal opponents in his last decision on access to security. His order revoked the authorization of the Prosecutor General of New York, Letitia James, who brought several proceedings against Trump and his businesses.

In a civil fraud trial which ended in 2024, A judge found Trump responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in fines. Trump appeals to the decision.

Manhattan district prosecutor Alvin BraggWho continued and won Trump’s criminal monetary affair last year, also lost his authorization.

Trump’s legal objectives have gone beyond elected prosecutors. He withdrew the security authorization for Norm Eisen, a lawyer leading several prosecutions against the Trump administration efforts to reduce the federal workforce.

Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor who joined an investigation into Trump during his first mandate and then provided media comments on the Mush Money trial, also lost his authorization.

Previous media reports had indicated that the administration had drawn the security authorization for a high -level lawyer in Washington, Mark Zaid.

Friday’s prescription listed it among the people who would lose access.

However, Mr. Zaid told the BBC that “although it was informed three times that my authorization had been revoked, I have still received nothing formally”.

He said that the loss of his security authorization would “federal employees, including Trump supporters, who count on me to manage cases that few other lawyers could”.

Several of the individuals chosen by Trump ridiculed his order in social media statements.

“I don’t care what Donald Trump does about a security authorization that has not been active for five years,” wrote Vindman on X.

Mr. Eisen wrote on X that Trump’s order “just makes me deposit even more prosecution!”

Trump had previously drawn security authorizations from more than four dozen intelligence officials whom he accused of mixing with the 2020 elections in favor of Joe Biden. He has provided no evidence of these complaints.

In February, Trump announced that he was Revoke access to security from Biden. In an article on social networks, Trump said that Biden “had created this precedent in 2021, when he asked the Intelligence Community (IC) to prevent the 45th President of the United States (me!) From access to national security details, a courtesy provided to former presidents”.

In 2021, Biden – as president at the time – prohibited his defeated rival Trump from having access to intelligence briefings citing his “erratic behavior”.

A special council report by the Ministry of Justice in 2024 revealed that Biden had poorly kept classified documents of his time as vice-president. The report noted that Biden had cooperated with federal investigators and returned the documents discovered.

In 2023, the special prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice Jack Smith charged Trump for having allegedly managed the classified documents after his first mandate and obstructing their return to the government.

Trump pleaded not guilty and a Federal judge from Florida rejected the case in July 2024. Smith officially abandoned the case that December after Trump’s re -election.