Blake Lively To Hit Co-Star Justin Baldoni With Fresh Allegations

The legal battle between Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni Continue to warm up, the actress’s lawyer revealing her plans to file a revised complaint with new allegations against the actor.

The lawyers of the co-stars at war were in court on Monday for a session prior to the trial, during which they entered a stormy exchange concerning the case and the need for a protective order.

While Blake Lively’s request for a gag prescription against Justin Baldoni’s lawyer was refused, the judge presiding over the case said he would adopt a rule to guarantee that the two lawyers control what they share.

Lively’s lawyer has hinted at his intention to file a new complaint with new allegations against Justin Baldoni.

During a session before the trial at 11 a.m. which did not forced the two stars to be present, the lawyer of Lively, Michael Gottlieb, denied the assertion that the star of “Gossip Girl” dragged him Deliberately the feet in the trial, saying that it ‘actually, ll file a update complaint with new allegations.

According to the Daily mailGottlieb told court that he planned to add “both complaints and parties” to a revised complaint, which they will file by Valentine’s Day.

Lively and Baldoni were involved in a legal battle after having filed a sexual harassment complaint against him, in which she also accused him of a “coordinated effort to destroy his reputation”.

Liveuse and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, had asked the judge presiding over the case, judge Lewis Liman, to give Baldoni’s lawyer for a gag to make false statements on their case.

They claimed that the protection order would prevent Baldoni lawyer from engaging in “inappropriate conduct”, including a “media campaign of harassment and reprisals” against them.

However, judge Liman did not seem to be influenced by their argument and denied their request. Instead, he revealed that he would adopt a rule for lawyers known as rule 3.6, which prohibits both parties from making extrajudicial statements that could influence the jury.

“I expect the parties to respect their ethical obligations. I do not expect this affair to turn into satellite disputes on the comments of a lawyer,” said Liman. “The two have said a lot in procedural acts that give the public a lot of regulations.”

Elsewhere during the judicial session, Gottlieb criticized Freedman for making statements outside the court which would have attacked the “character, integrity and veracity” of Lively.

Baldoni apparently marked what he would consider as a legal victory after judge Liman denied the argument of Lively who sought to prevent Freedman from being the lawyer to hold his deposition.

The actor has since retaliated on the trial of sexual harassment of Lively with his own counter-deposit of $ 400 million, where he accused it and Reynolds of trying to divert his film with their power and their influence.

Recent reports suggest that the couple would be “imminent” assigned to make to produce all forms of communication, including text and emails, on Baldoni and “it ends with us”.

An initiate knowledge told the Daily mail That Reynolds and Lively, as well as their publicist Leslie Sloane, are also confronted with a deposition, who will see them order to provide hours of testimony and to be interviewed by Baldoni lawyers.

Lively’s lawyer, Gottlieb, tried to prevent Freedman from being the lawyer who would direct the deposit of Lively. However, according to the poorJudge Liman rejected him saying: “I don’t think it will happen” because he noted that Gottlieb would not be the one who decides.

Many other people can be trained in the animated legal war and Baldoni, as Gottlieb told court that he would ask for a protective order to protect Lively and the famous friends of Reynold.

Although no name was mentioned, Baldoni had previously referred to Taylor Swift in his $ 400 million complaint against Lively, saying that she had used Popstar to put it pressure.

“We believe that there will be provisions in a protection order which will be appropriate in this case given the nature of the allegations and the very publicized nature of some of the people who will be involved,” said Gottlieb.

“There are a significant number of high-level individuals on both sides,” he added. “In particular, responding to the interests and needs of third parties will be very important in this case.”

The judge agreed with him and said that even before the other parties were named, “you have already had many high -level people” involved. Baldoni lawyer also said he would be ready to accept the order.

Lively and Reynolds have allegedly allegedly allegedly led by Baldoni to “reprisal campaign” against the actress and that the way the case is treated “can have deep consequences”.

According to DeadlineThe couple’s lawyer made the complaints in a previous letter sent to the Liman judge, in which they doubled the need for an order of gag.

“Obligning the lawyer to take into account the ethical rules which bind them is not a gag prescription; it is a mechanism which will guarantee that the procedure of this court is not detrimental to the conduct of the lawyer Outside the courtroom, “the lawyer Esra Hudson wrote on behalf of the couple.

“The Wayfarer parties try to draw a dangerous false equivalence which can have deep consequences not only for this case, but for other women who are sexually harassed in the workplace given the profile of this case,” continued the letter .