Like his successor, Daniel Craig, Pierce Brosnan’s race as James Bond was a slow descent into the parody. Maybe it had something to do with Martin Campbell by organizing the beginnings of the two actors in 007, with the British filmmaker supervising “Goldeneye” from 1995 and “Casino Royale” in 2006. Anyway, at the moment Where Brosnan hung up the tuxedo, he had played in what is almost universally considered to be the worst Bond film ever made: “Die Another Day”. It is The worst film 007 according to IMDB And he also claimed the lower spot in / Own bond movie film ranking.
“Die Another Day” is actually a good time if you agree to the total absurdity of his ice palates, his invisible cars and central protagonists who surgically transform from the generals of the Korean army to unbearable British aristocrats . However, but you look at him, Brosnan has barely released up, and since then, his mandate in 007 has occupied a strange space in the history of the franchise.
Some fans absolutely love Brosnan’s bond, while others argue that he was only browsing the movements. As such, Brosnan has never really had an identifiable “thing”. Sean Connery is at the origin of the role of Bond for the masses, Roger Moore was the light version, and even the predecessor of Brosnan, Timothy Dalton, became known for having launched a more robust link of the decades before Craig does even. But Brosnan does not really have a definable characteristic. He certainly looked at the game and was as sweet as you hoped that Bond was in “Goldeneye”. But not only have his films gradually become more stupid as they continued, but the actor himself is not necessarily known for a particular line or a defined liaison characteristic. Not that such a thing is a requirement, it’s just that it might have something to do with Bru’s own doubts about his time at 007.
The Irish actor obviously believes that he was never really good enough in the role, since he could not review the films for a quarter of a century.
Pierce Brosnan has mixed feelings about the revisation of the link
In 2020, Pierce Brosnan revised “Goldeneye” (which almost featured Timothy Dalton) featured) for an online supervisor. As the actor admitted during the event, it was the very first time he had seen the film since he did. It is a 25 years between the beginnings of the film and the first time that Brosnan had seen it, which might not seem so surprising, because it is not uncommon for the actors to avoid looking at their own performances. But it seems that there is more for Brosnan’s decision to stay away from “Goldeneye” for 25 years than a general preference for not having reviewed his own business.
Speaking to Telegraph In 2014, the actor said he had never seen any of his liaison films again because he thought it was “never good enough”. In the interview, he reveals that his three sons often asked him to watch the films with them, but he has always refused. “I felt that I was caught in a time chain between Roger and Sean,” he said, adding:
“It was very difficult to grasp the meaning of, for me. Violence has never been real, man’s brute force was never palpable. It was quite docile, and the characterization had No follow -up of reality, it was surface.
When asked if he could never see the films again at the time, Brosnan said: “I have no desire to look at myself as James Bond. Because it’s never good enough. It’s good. A horrible feeling. ” Given the prestige of the saga 007, it is understandable that Brosnan would feel embarrassed to restore justice to the role. But there is probably more than that.
Playing Bond is a double -edged sword
During his surveillance “Goldneye”, Pierce Brosnan spoke of seeing “Goldfinger” in 1964 and growing up with the link of Sean Connery, who surely added to the pressure he felt by playing the role in 1995. End of rewatch, it was positive but laconic. “I don’t know what to say,” he said, “except that it was good while it lasted and there are new adventures to have.” It is not a bad way to summarize his first return of the film, since he had been so categorical to avoid it for a quarter of a century.
Interestingly, this attitude of “new adventures to have” seems to be another aspect for his refusal to review the films as well. In an interview in 2022 with the Proven clubHe was asked if he had reviewed his Bond films and said, “I don’t particularly like to watch the work. It’s done. It’s over. It’s next.”
Otherwise, there could have been a persistent resentment about how his films went after “Goldeneye”. In 2005, three years after its final release in 007 in “Die Another Day”, Brosnan spoke to CBS News On the way the character “never felt real” for him and how he never felt that he had “a total property on Bond”. The “stupid liners” are particularly question and the fact that he felt “chained by a contracted image”. In other words, it seems that Brosnan was really happy to leave Bond in 2002, which could only have added to his desire not to see his performances again.
In many ways, then, a bit like Connery himself, Bond’s role was a double-edged sword For Brosnan, and there was much more in his refusal to see the films again than not wanting to watch himself on the screen. Fortunately, we can see them as many times as we want, even if it’s just to have a good time with the stupidity of “Die Another Day”.
